Secondary traumatic stress and psychological distress among responders to the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Review and meta-analysis examines secondary traumatic stress, PTSD and related distress among earthquake responders, including factors that responders identified as making work more bearable.
Published on IPP
Author(s): Metin Çınaroğlu; Eda Yılmazer
Source: Frontiers in Public Health
Publisher(s): Frontiers Media SA
Publication date: 8 October 2026
Country: Türkiye
Why it matters in operational practice: Welfare planning should be designed into prolonged or traumatic incidents—relief, role rotation, supervision, post-incident follow-up and routes to support—not deferred until after demobilisation.
Operational transferability: Applicable with adaptation across SAR organisations, particularly major incidents and body-recovery or disaster deployments.
Important methodological limitations: Evidence is tied to one exceptional disaster, mixed responder groups and variable study quality; it cannot establish which support interventions cause better outcomes.
Training influence: Include welfare and cumulative-exposure decisions in command exercises, alongside relief planning, supervisor check-ins and structured post-incident support.
SAR training sections: Incident management; leadership; fatigue and welfare; planning decisions and contingencies; handover; organisational learning.